"There's
a great big beautiful tomorrow/Shining at the end of every day."
--- Disneyland’s Carousel of Progress, 1967.
I was thinking about our big beautiful tomorrow recently
when I watched a video produced by a Google subsidiary called Boston Dynamics.
In it, they introduced their latest invention, a robotic dog called Spot who
weighs in at 160 pounds, can run, jump and climb hills and stairs with the best
of them.
The company has produced several other “animals” that
run faster and jump higher than their human overlords. They share one other
trait: they are terrifying.
Spot is no Golden Retriever. He is a headless, tailless menacing machine that
looks like it was rejected by “Star Wars” as too evil looking.
During the video presentation, a Boston Dynamics
employee stepped into camera range and delivered a swift kick to Spot’s
midsection. The “dog” staggered briefly, legs flayed, then regained his
balance. You could almost hear the growls.
When they figure out how to pack a brain into one of
these contraptions, Spot and his buddies, remembering that kick, may someday gather
in packs and chase us off a cliff.
Or, as one wag remarked, “An artificially intelligent
elevator will ask him "Are you the guy who kicked the robo-dog?" just
as the doors are closing.” Fade to
black.
We’ve been assured that we have nothing to fear from
robots, even nightmarish creatures like Spot. And being a nation that embraces
technology, we believe it.
Then we read this recent news dispatch:
“When a South
Korean woman invested in a robot vacuum cleaner, the idea was to leave her
trustworthy gadget to do its work while she took a break from household chores.
“Instead, the 52-year-old resident of Changwon city
ended up being the victim of what many believe is a peek into a dystopian
future in which supposedly benign robots turn against their human masters.
“The woman, whose name is being withheld, was taking a
nap on the floor at home when the vacuum cleaner locked on to her hair and
sucked it up, apparently mistaking it for dust.
“Unable to free
herself, she called the fire department with a “desperate rescue plea” and was
separated from the robot’s clutches by paramedics, according to a South
Korean newspaper.”
Then, there was this:
“A Swedish company has been
fined 25,000 kronor ($3,000) after a malfunctioning robot attacked and almost
killed one of its workers at a factory north of Stockholm.
“The incident took place when an industrial worker was
trying to carry out maintenance on a defective machine generally used to lift
heavy rocks. Thinking he had cut off the power supply, the man approached the
robot with no sense of trepidation.
“But the robot suddenly came to life and grabbed a
tight hold of the victim's head. The man succeeded in defending himself but not
before suffering serious injuries.”
OK, so things go wrong sometimes. But what happens
when things go wrong with something more deadly than a vacuum cleaner? Think of
Spot with a heat-seeking missile strapped to his back.
The day of the Killer Bots is not that far away.
Gen. Robert Cone, the chief of the Army’s Training and
Doctrine Command, was quoted in a published report that he thinks there’s a
chance the size of the military’s brigade combat teams will shrink by a quarter
in the coming years from 4,000 total troops down to 3,000.
Picking up the slack, he said, could be a fleet of
robotic killing machines akin to the ground versions of the unmanned aerial
vehicles, or drones, increasingly used by the world’s armies.
We are already beginning to develop robots that can
coordinate autonomously—that is, with no human input—in order to complete
team objectives. Just last August, Harvard’s School of Engineering and Applied
Sciences invented a robotic swarm consisting of 1,000 small robots
that worked to form shapes.
So here we stand at the threshold of a great big
beautiful tomorrow populated by robotic killing machines that can think for
themselves.
No less a visionary than Stephen Hawking, the preeminent
physicist, has warned that success in creating artificial intelligence “would
be the biggest event in human history, [but] unfortunately, it might also be
the last.”
It’s serious enough that in Geneva this past year, 118
nations present at a UN conference agreed about the need to tackle the future
threat of robotic killing systems, according to Human Rights Watch.
Abandon the research and development of robotics? No,
but let us proceed with caution.
Let’s hope this is one case where the human race
doesn’t learn a lesson through trial and error.
Robert Rector is a veteran of 50 years in print journalism. He has worked at the San Francisco Examiner, Los Angeles Herald Examiner, Valley News, Los Angeles Times and Pasadena Star-News. He can be reached at Nulede@Aol.Com.