I don’t know what Father’s Day will look like 50 or
100 years from now. I suspect
gender-specific celebrations will have fallen out of favor.
But for today, at least, it remains a time to doff our
hats to the Defenders of the Cave, the Slayers of Dragons, Disposers of Scary
Insects, Uncloggers of Toilets, Movers of Furniture and Grillers of Meat.
An old-fashioned notion, perhaps. But I suspect in many homes that Mother’s Day
still means long-stemmed roses and champagne brunches while Father’s Day means
a new crescent wrench and a beer by the barbecue.
As a small boy once said of Father's Day: “It's just
like Mother's Day only you don't spend so much."
That’s OK with me.
I don’t want to be fussed over on Father’s Day. After all, when it comes to the gestation and
production of a child, moms do all the heavy lifting.
When our little bundles arrived, I discovered that I
had to man up or move out. So I changed diapers, read bedtime stories, fixed
breakfast, lunch and dinner when called upon, rose at dawn on the weekends so
my wife could sleep in and in my spare time made sure I imparted the foundation
of my profession to my kids: critical
thinking skills, a healthy skepticism and a sense of humor.
Along with my wife, I went to what seemed like several
million piano recitals, soccer games, back to school nights and PTA pancake
breakfasts. In sickness and in health.
If I had to do it all again, I gladly would. I didn’t
have to be prodded to be an active dad. If you loved your family, it’s what you
did.
All of this is somewhat remarkable in that my wife and
I came of age in the Eisenhower administration. Women wore aprons, stayed at
home, tended the kids and joined book clubs. Men went off to work (or war, as
the case may be), came home to their pipe and slippers and left for work early the
next morning.
By the time we were married in the late 60s, all of
that was beginning to change. Parenthood and child rearing were becoming shared
responsibilities, women were entering the work force, aprons had all but
disappeared.
So had the notion of Dad as a Sage Breadwinner who
dispensed dollops of advice and little else.
Fast forward to now:
On the surface, things seem to be about the same. The ideal dad is married,
invested and present in the lives of his children, living with his family, and
employed in full-time stable work with good pay and benefits.
Because his wife is also working full time, the
sharing of responsibilities has become more than a moral obligation. It’s an
economic necessity.
We see plenty of dads, happily carrying their babies
in Snuglis and men’s bathrooms have changing tables, so all must be well.
Not so fast, say Oregon State University professor Richard
A. Settersten Jr. and assistant professor Doris Cancel-Tirado in their study,
“Fatherhood as a Hidden Variable in Men’s Development and Life Courses.”
There are disturbing social trends facing men,
including the rise of men having children outside of marriage, the increase in
men having children with numerous women and the growing numbers of divorced fathers,
say the professors, quoted in the Huffington Post.
Divorce all too often reduces a dad’s time with his
kids or cuts him out of the picture entirely. But men who have kids outside of
marriage, often African-American men and those without college degrees, are
even less likely to be involved in their lives than divorced dads, they note.
A survey by the Pew Research Center found that marriage,
while declining among all groups, remains the norm for adults with a college
education and good income but is now markedly less prevalent among those on the
lower rungs of the socio-economic ladder.
The survey also finds striking differences by
generation. In 1960, two-thirds (68%) of all twenty-somethings were married. In
recent surveys, just 26% were. How many of today’s youth will eventually marry
is an open question. For now, the survey finds that the young are much
more inclined than their elders to view cohabitation without marriage and other
new family forms — such as same sex marriage and interracial marriage — in a
positive light.
All of which means that the ideal father isn’t nearly
as widespread as we’d like to believe, the professors say. Instead, there are
many more fathers today who are vulnerable — not in the sensitive guy kind of
way, but in their ability to be present and provide for their children.
“In aggregate, men are becoming less intensely
involved with and committed to children,” they write. Instead, the trends
suggest “men’s family relationships en masse remain relatively fragmented and
tenuous.”
This is a troubling trend. Research shows that
that dads have a profound influence on their kids—socially, developmentally,
economically, psychologically. They are role models and companions, and their
positive presence is a big plus for kids.
Settersten and Cancel-Tirado argue that instead of
policies that just strengthen marriage — which more and more people are
questioning, and rejecting, as a valid institution — we should be supporting
all intimate relationships as well as enlarging the legal and social
definitions of family to reflect the many types of families we have today. Flex
time, job sharing, parity in child support levels and legal benefits for
unmarried fathers raising children in committed relationships are among their
suggestions.
It’s hard to see how all this will play out in the
future. But if you see a dad today, give
him a hug. Because, at least for the time being, fatherhood
matters.
Robert Rector is a veteran of 50 years in
print journalism. He has worked at the San Francisco Examiner, Los Angeles
Herald Examiner, Valley News, Los Angeles Times and Pasadena Star-News. His
columns can be found at Robert-Rector@Blogspot.Com.
Follow him on Twitter at @robertrector1.
No comments:
Post a Comment